“Build Back Better” to Boost ESG

Western Asset is aligned with efforts to achieve a lower-carbon future. Reaching net zero will be a win not only for ESG investors, but for us all.

    Bonnie M. Wongtrakool

    In our analysis of potential election outcomes last fall, we outlined how a second Trump term would continue to challenge ESG-oriented investors and companies, and how a Biden victory would result in a more supportive environment, subject to the ideological balance within Congress. While few could have predicted the gut-wrenching events of last week, it is now clear that the Democrats will take razor-thin control of the Senate as President-elect Biden moves into the Oval Office on January 20. Ahead of these changes, we share our views on how the ESG movement could accelerate under the new political regime.

    In his “Build Back Better” plan, Biden outlined four key priorities: combating COVID-19; building back the US economy; advancing racial equity; and tackling the climate crisis. Though articulated separately in Biden’s platform, these priorities are deeply connected. Reaching “net zero” for greenhouse gas emissions will not only require significant spending and investment, but will also force us to confront a number of systemic challenges—whether from climate change, uneven economic opportunity, or lack of access to affordable health care—that disproportionately impact minority communities.

    To be sure, Biden’s immediate energies will be consumed by accelerating COVID-19 vaccinations and providing income relief. Yet Biden has also assembled a team that “will be ready on day one to confront the existential threat of climate change with a unified national response rooted in science and equity.”1 This group includes a diverse set of experienced and environmentally minded Cabinet nominees whose confirmations (with the new Democratic Senate majority) now seem reasonably assured. In addition, Biden has created two new high-level positions: a National Climate Adviser who will head up the first White House Office of Domestic Climate Policy, and an international climate envoy who will also sit on the National Security Council.

    In his climate platform, Biden pledged to decarbonize the power generation sector by 2035 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Aside from rejoining the Paris Agreement2 on January 20, the Biden administration is likely to pull on three levers to advance these ambitions.

    First, the federal government is expected to use its vast regulatory powers to improve corporate and investor behavior. The US Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Energy, for example, could raise standards for auto vehicles and appliances, power plants, air and water pollution, and methane emissions by oil and gas companies. The US Securities and Exchange Commission could standardize and mandate issuer disclosures around environmental risks and board and management diversity, and could require asset managers to provide transparency around their approaches to ESG and the climate concerns in their portfolios. Banking regulators could include climate scenarios in their resilience tests to drive more efficient pricing of environmental risks across the economy. Note that the Federal Reserve, whose responsibilities include supervising financial institutions, recently joined the Network for Greening the Financial System, a consortium of central banks working to develop climate risk management best practices in the financial sector and support the low-carbon transition across capital markets.

    Second, the administration and legislature will attempt to pass an infrastructure stimulus package that includes funding for clean energy investments and research. As envisioned in Biden’s campaign proposal, this package would include research funding for battery, carbon capture and green hydrogen technologies, the addition of 500,000 additional electric vehicle charging stations (which currently number 50,000), and upgrades to 4 million commercial buildings and 2 million homes. The $900 billion December stimulus bill, which received bipartisan support, included extensions for a number of investment and production tax credits for alternative energy. But we believe that a more comprehensive set of provisions, with an expected price above $2 trillion, could be passed through the reconciliation process.

    Third, the administration may implement carbon pricing across the US. A carbon tax or cap-and-trade emissions scheme would be most impactful if introduced at a national level, but could also be administered at a state or regional level. Even absent Congressional support for a carbon tax, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission could apply carbon pricing in electricity markets to help push the country toward the 2035 decarbonization goal. Such actions may be needed to remain competitive with efforts in other countries. Carbon border adjustments, which would place levies on imports of emissions-intensive goods from countries with more lenient standards, are on the European Union docket for 2021, and are being considered by other US trading partners as well. Treasury Secretary-nominee Janet Yellen has been a vocal proponent of carbon taxes and carbon border adjustments, and will likely be advocating for carbon pricing within the new Administration.

    Western Asset is aligned with efforts to achieve a lower-carbon future. Reaching net zero will be a win not only for ESG investors, but for us all.

    ENDNOTES

    1. Bloomberg “Biden Unveils Team ‘Ready on Day One’ to Fight Climate Change”, December 17, 2020

    2. The Paris Agreement is a legally binding international treaty on climate change. It was adopted by 196 Parties at COP 21 in Paris, on 12 December 2015 and entered into force on 4 November 2016. Its goal is to limit global warming to well below 2, preferably to 1.5 degrees Celsius, compared to pre-industrial levels.


    WHAT ARE THE RISKS?

    Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index. Unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.

    Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal. Fixed-income securities involve interest rate, credit, inflation and reinvestment risks; and possible loss of principal. As interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities falls. International investments are subject to special risks including currency fluctuations, social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in emerging markets. Commodities and currencies contain heightened risk that include market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions and may not be suitable for all investors.

    U.S. Treasuries are direct debt obligations issued and backed by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. The U.S. government guarantees the principal and interest payments on U.S. Treasuries when the securities are held to maturity. Unlike U.S. Treasuries, debt securities issued by the federal agencies and instrumentalities and related investments may or may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Even when the U.S. government guarantees principal and interest payments on securities, this guarantee does not apply to losses resulting from declines in the market value of these securities.