Leaving Franklin Templeton

Clicking OK below will take you to an independent site. Information and services provided on this independent site are not reviewed by, guaranteed by, or endorsed by Franklin Templeton or its affiliates. Please keep in mind that this independent site's terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information may be different from those of Franklin Templeton's site. Franklin Templeton is not liable for any direct or indirect technical or system issues, consequences or damages arising from your use of this independent website.
Franklin Equity The Intelligence Economy Equity

The Intelligence Economy: Breaking Health Care’s “Iron Triangle”

How AI can improve quality, access and cost all at once. In this paper, Steve Burlingame revisits the "Iron Triangle", a decades-old framework for health care systems that focuses on the constraints between quality, access and cost.

Franklin Equity

Published date

October 22, 2026

View more from this team

Reading time

8 minutes

[signin.article-banner-document-title]

Key takeaways

  • Health care is an overlooked AI beneficiary: We think the market is giving little credit for the benefits of AI in health care.
  • Breaking the Iron Triangle: Scalable medical intelligence can improve quality, access and cost at the same time, rather than trading one for another.
  • AI is a force multiplier for health care innovation: AI accelerates advances already underway across drugs, devices, diagnostics and care delivery.

Health care is one of the largest sectors in most developed economies—yet it remains one of the least recognized beneficiaries of artificial intelligence (AI). We think the market may be underestimating AI’s potential to reshape the sector. To understand why, it helps to revisit the "Iron Triangle", a decades-old framework for health care systems that focuses on the constraints between quality, access and cost.

Health Care Has Rarely Mattered More to the Economy—or Less to the Market

Early evidence is emerging that both the health care sector and the patients it serves will benefit, perhaps substantially, from advances in AI. Yet, we believe today’s investors are assigning little value to that long-term potential.

By the end of 2026, health care is expected to account for over 18% of the US economy, yet it currently represents only 9.1% of the S&P 500.1 That gap highlights a striking disconnect between the sector’s economic importance and its market value, just as AI appears poised to begin reshaping its long-term growth potential.

Exhibit 1: Health Care is 18%+ of the US Economy but 9% of the US Stock Market
January 1, 1990–2026E

Line chart showing diverging trends between U.S. healthcare spending and healthcare stock market performance from 1990 through the 2026 estimate. Healthcare expenditures as a share of GDP rise steadily from 12.1% to 18.4%, while the healthcare stock market proxy fluctuates and declines to 9.3% by 2026, illustrating a widening gap between spending growth and investment returns.

E= Estimate. Sources: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), National Health Expenditure Accounts; Bloomberg Finance L.P.; S&P 500 Index; Franklin Equity estimates. Health care spending represents US National Health Expenditures as a percentage of GDP. Health care stock market share represents the Health Care sector weight in the S&P 500 Index. Histori-cal data through 2025; 2026 healthcare spending estimate. Data as at September 30, 2026. There is no assurance that any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized.

We see attractive investment opportunities among health care companies where ongoing innovation trends, increasingly amplified by AI, can strengthen long-term earnings power. Because most health care companies aren’t priced as near-term AI beneficiaries, a select few may offer both diversification from AI-driven volatility and potential upside as AI improves their underlying business models over time.

But the potential benefits of AI in health care extend beyond individual companies. Early proof points suggest AI can fundamentally rebalance the Iron Triangle's long-standing trade-offs.

A Decades-old Constraint: Health Care’s Iron Triangle

In Medicine’s Dilemmas, published in 1994, William Kissick described health care as a give-and-take process between three critical variables: quality, access and cost. Kissick used a triangle to symbolize these trade-offs with each side representing one variable and each variable constraining the others. The idea reflects what we have all experienced:

  • Broader access raises spending and / or reduces quality.
  • Increased quality involves accessing a finite number of specialists with above-average fees and a penchant for expensive technology and medicines.
  • Aggressive attempts to control costs invariably restrict access to these same higher-quality specialists, drugs and technologies.

The triangle is “iron” because Kissick saw few ways to change the restrictive compromises between quality, access, and cost.

The trade-offs look different by system and country but are present everywhere: single-payer systems tend to maintain cost and quality by rationing access through waiting lists; the US maintains access and quality for the insured at exceptional cost; and many emerging markets lack the specialist supply to deliver quality at any price.

Exhibit 2: Health Care’s Iron Triangle
A persistent trade-off for more than three decades

Infographic depicting the healthcare Iron Triangle, which balances three competing priorities: quality, access, and cost. The graphic emphasizes that improving one area often creates trade-offs in the others. Additional text explains that structural barriers and concentrated healthcare spending contribute to a U.S. healthcare system that prioritizes treatment of illness over prevention.

 AI May Improve Access and Cost Before It Revolutionizes Drug Development 

Innovations in drugs, devices and diagnostics have traditionally improved the quality side of the triangle through greater efficacy and more personalized care. Recent advances in AI could accelerate breakthroughs already underway across cancer, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disorders and other areas. But meaningfully improving success rates in drug development may still be years away given the extraordinary complexity of human biology, limited high-quality training data, and the need to validate results in years-long human trials. In the interim, the more transformational opportunity for AI may lie on the other two sides of the Iron Triangle: access and cost.

The triangle was iron for a reason: medical intelligence was scarce. It lived inside a finite number of experts, buildings, and 15-minute appointment slots, so expanding access to it meant spending more or diluting quality. AI changes the underlying constraint. When specialist-grade intelligence can be delivered through a coach, a nurse, or an app at low marginal cost, expanding access no longer requires expanding spending—and continuous, low-cost access unlocks the cheapest form of care there is: prevention.

The opportunity to improve access is significant given more than 100 million Americans live in communities without adequate primary care.2 Demand far exceeds supply—many physicians are retiring, burnout remains high, and fewer than half of graduating medical doctors express an interest in primary care.3

AI-infused hybrid care models are beginning to close this gap

By combining AI with nurse practitioners, health coaches, and smartphone apps, these models put specialist-grade medical intelligence in patients’ hands around the clock—in ways that build patient trust. Many patients now prefer these low-cost, continuous relationships to waiting months for a primary care physician or specialist appointment.

Better access, in turn, lowers cost. When patients can receive quality medical guidance early and often, chronic conditions like diabetes and hypertension can be managed before they spiral into complications that cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix. 

AI can also help address another source of scarcity: clinician time. Doctors and nurses spend an estimated 20%–30% of their time on administrative tasks.4 Automating even a portion of that work could return scarce clinical capacity to patient care and help ease labor constraints.

These benefits reinforce one another. Savings can be banked—or reinvested in greater access to higher-quality drugs, devices and diagnostics, where AI can further amplify an already healthy cadence of innovation.

How AI-infused care can improve quality, access and cost for a Medicare patient with chronic conditions

Exhibit 3: Breaking the Iron Triangle—One Patient’s Story (Illustrative)

Infographic illustrating how continuous, AI-supported healthcare can improve quality, access, and cost at the same time. A 74-year-old patient with diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure receives ongoing monitoring, coaching, and rapid clinical intervention, preventing a potential hospitalization. The graphic contrasts a $25,000-plus hospitalization under episodic care with less than $1,000 per year for continuous care, emphasizing preventive care, patient trust, and better health outcomes.*The <$1,000 estimate covers only the AI-hybrid care layer: coaching, 24/7 nurse access, remote monitoring and virtual visits. It excludes drugs, physician visits, hospital services and all other costs of care, which typically total far more per patient. Hypothetical patient; figures are approximate US averages. Figures are US; the care model is not. Hybrid AI-coach-nurse models are being deployed in the UK, India and elsewhere, with local cost structures.

The Stakes Are High in Health Care, but Systemwide Trust Is Low

Most health systems, and the US fee-for-service model in particular, often pay to fix us after we break, not to keep us from breaking in the first place. Medical intelligence has historically been locked inside appointment slots—at a specialist’s office, a hospital, or a laboratory—and reaching it means navigating an expensive, disjointed maze of health care providers. 

Some companies are now pursuing a different approach with AI-infused hybrid care that bypasses dysfunctional legacy infrastructure and separates intelligence from place of service. The result improves quality, increases access and lowers cost—simultaneously. 

These companies are using AI systems to build trust with patients. The adage that “no one cares how much you know, until they know how much you care” carries extra weight in health care, where the stakes are high, but systemwide trust is low. Patients are unlikely to embrace new innovations if they don’t trust the providers recommending them—and trust is hard to build when patients see their doctor for just 15 minutes a few times a year.5 When AI absorbs the paperwork and helps guide interactions, coaches and nurses gain the time to know a patient’s life and connect the care plan to what that patient truly wants—whether that is staying independent or dancing at a granddaughter’s wedding. And when trust runs high, patients often grant providers more freedom to innovate.

Trust fell by almost half in under four years

Share in US adults expressing "a lot" of trust in physicians and hospitals

Exhibit 4: Medical Intelligence Only Matters if Patients Trust It
US Adults Expressing Confidence in Physicians and Hospitals6

Icon-based infographic showing public trust declining from 71.5% in April 2020 to 40.1% in January 2024, a drop of 31.4 percentage points. A note explains that this trust gap is significant because healthcare innovations must earn patient trust before they can be widely adopted.Source: Perlis RH, et al., JAMA Network Open, July 2024 (50-state survey of US adults).

AI Is a Force Multiplier for Innovation Through Recombination

Most innovations involve recombining existing ideas with new ones to arrive at novel solutions. To illustrate the power of recombination, consider the four established approaches to treating cancer: surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The combination of these approaches results in 24 total treatment options for a given cancer (4x3x2x1). 

In August, Moderna and Merck announced that the Phase 3 trial of their first-in-class mRNA cancer vaccine, known as V940, succeeded in the treatment of skin cancer (melanoma).7 Used in combination with Merck’s immunotherapy, Keytruda, V940 demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival compared with Keytruda alone.  

If the cancer vaccine developed by Moderna and Merck ends up representing a new approach for treating cancer, then society’s treatment options didn’t simply increase by one, they increased by a factor of five, to 120 (5x4x3x2x1).8 Adding a new treatment modality expands the number of ways existing approaches can potentially be combined to create exponentially more options. This is the power of recombination as a central driver of innovation across not only therapeutics, but also specialty diagnostics, medical devices, and countless industries outside of the healthcare sector. 

AI adds another dimension: It can accelerate the discovery of new ideas and efficiently identify the best possible solutions that emerge from an ever-expanding set of possibilities.

Exhibit 5: Innovation Multiplies Through New Combinations
New building blocks multiply what's possible

Educational infographic illustrating the combinatorial impact of adding an mRNA cancer vaccine platform to cancer care. A treatment system with four modalities (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy) offers 24 possible treatment combinations, while adding an mRNA vaccine platform increases the number of combinations to 120. The image highlights how new technology platforms can expand treatment design options in oncology.Source: Franklin Equity. Exhibit is for illustrative purposes only.

The Market Is Giving Little Credit for the Benefits of AI in Health Care

We see clear early signals that AI-infused health care solutions can break the historical constraints between health care quality, access and cost.

Regulations and misaligned incentives may slow the pace of adoption, but the direction of travel is clear and the magnitude of impact looks significant. 

All investments can be thought of as some combination of price paid (what you give) and future earnings power (what you get). At current prices, we believe investors are giving little credit for

AI-driven innovations that can increase the long-term earnings potential of many health care companies in the US and around the world.    

Follow Steve Burlingame, CFA

Steve Burlingame, CFA avatar
Vice President Research Analyst Franklin Equity

EndNotes

  1. Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Office of the Actuary, National Health Expenditure Projections, 2025–2034; S&P Dow Jones Indices. Healthcare spending as a percentage of US GDP is projected for calendar year 2026; S&P 500 Health Care sector weight of 9.1% as of July 31, 2026. S&P 500 sector classifications based on GICS®. There is no assurance that any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized.
  2. Sources: National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC) and HealthLandscape, Closing the Primary Care Gap: How Community Health Centers Can Address the Nation's Primary Care Crisis, February 2023; National Academy of Med-icine, "Implementing High-Quality Primary Care in 2025: Key Policy Priorities," 2025. More than 100 million Americans face barriers to accessing primary care, based in part on Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Health Professional Shortage Area designations.
  3. Sources: Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), The Complexities of Physician Supply and Demand: Projections From 2021 to 2036, March 2024; American Medical Association (AMA), 2025 National Physician Comparison Report, April 2026; Milbank Memorial Fund and The Physicians Foundation, The Health of US Primary Care: 2025 Scorecard Report, February 2025. AAMC projects a US physician shortage of up to 86,000 by 2036 and reports that 42% of the clinical physician workforce is age 55 or older. AMA reported that 41.9% of physicians experienced at least one symptom of burnout in 2025. The Primary Care Scorecard found that only 24.4% of new physicians entered primary care in 2022, the lowest rate in a decade.
  4. Sources: Sinsky, C., et al., "Allocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice: A Time and Motion Study in 4 Specialties," Annals of Internal Medicine, 2016 (physicians spent 49.2% of the office day on electronic health record and desk work, versus 27.0% on direct clinical face time); Hendrich, A., et al., "A 36-Hospital Time and Motion Study: How Do Medical-Surgical Nurses Spend Their Time?" The Permanente Journal, 2008 (documentation accounted for 35.3% of nursing practice time).
  5. Source: Neprash, H.T., et al., “Measuring Primary Care Exam Length Using Electronic Health Record Data.” Medical Care, 2021.
  6. Source: Perlis RH, et al. “Trust in Physicians and Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a 50-State Survey of US Adults.” JAMA Network Open. July 31, 2024. Note: Based on 582,634 responses from 443,455 U.S. adults across 24 survey waves conducted from April 2020 through January 2024. Percentages represent respondents reporting “a lot” of trust in physicians and hospitals.
  7. Source: Moderna, Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc. “Merck and Moderna Announce Phase 3 INTerpath-001 Trial of Intismeran Autogene Plus KEYTRUDA® Met Endpoints of Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) and Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) in Patients With Completely Resected Stage IIB-IV Melanoma.” August 19, 2026. V940 (intismeran autogene) is an investigational individualized neoantigen therapy.
  8. This example treats all potential sequences of treatment combinations as distinct treatment options. In practice, the sequence of treatments would be constrained.

 

WHAT ARE THE RISKS?

All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal.

Small- and mid-cap stocks involve greater risks and volatility than large-cap stocks.

Investment strategies which incorporate the identification of thematic investment opportunities, and their performance, may be negatively impacted if the investment manager does not correctly identify such opportunities or if the theme develops in an unexpected manner. Focusing investments in the health care and biotechnology sectors carries much greater risks of adverse developments and price movements in such industries than a strategy that invests in a wider variety of industries.

Any companies and/or case studies referenced herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio.

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. This material may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Any research and analysis contained in this material has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton ("FT") has not independently verified, validated or audited such data.  Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. The mention of any individual securities should neither constitute nor be construed as a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell any securities, and the information provided regarding such individual securities (if any) is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Franklin Templeton has environmental, social and governance (ESG) capabilities; however, not all strategies or products for a strategy consider “ESG” as part of their investment process.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Templeton, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com. Investments are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed.

You need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print PDF documents. Download a free version from Adobe's website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

Download the Franklin Templeton 529 Program Description

You’re almost there.
Please agree to receive the Franklin Templeton 529 Program Description electronically, then the application will be ready to download on the next page.
Open, read, and retain the Program Description and Participation Agreement:
Franklin 529 College Savings Plan - Program Description and Participation Agreement
By clicking “I agree” and accessing this document, you acknowledge and agree that:
Electronic Delivery - The Program Description is being delivered to you in electronic form in lieu of paper delivery.
Consent - You hereby consent to receive this document electronically and acknowledge that such electronic delivery satisfies any legal or contractual requirements that this document is provided to you in writing.
Ability to Access - You represent that you have the necessary hardware and software to access, view, download, and retain the document in electronic form (including PDF format), and that you are able to print a copy for your records if you choose.
Retention - You are responsible for retaining a copy of the downloaded document for your records.
Withdrawal of Consent - Your consent applies solely to this document. If you do not consent, you should not proceed with the download and may request a paper copy by calling (866) 362-1597.
The application will open once “I Agree” is pressed.

Sign in to view documents