Skip to content

Emerging markets (EM) have benefited from a meaningful shift in sentiment over recent weeks. The dominant macro catalyst has been the prospect of a US-Iran peace agreement and the expected reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices have retraced more than 30% from their wartime peak. At the same time, US equities and credit spreads have largely priced in a favorable geopolitical outcome.

For EM investors, the peace dividend is clearly positive. Lower oil prices reduce pressure on current accounts, fiscal subsidies and consumer purchasing power across many oil-importing economies. They also ease some of the immediate pressure on central banks that had been forced to respond to the inflationary consequences of higher energy prices. The risk rally has been particularly helpful for high-yield and frontier market sovereigns, where spreads had widened during the earlier phase of the conflict.

That said, one should be careful about extrapolating the market reaction too far. There is an important distinction between a financial market repricing and a real economy normalization. Markets can quickly discount a peace agreement, but physical trade flows, inventories and supply chains take longer to repair. A reopening of the Strait of Hormuz would be a major step forward, but shipping companies, insurers and commodity traders are unlikely to immediately return to pre-conflict operating behavior. Energy inventories also need time to rebuild, and disrupted regional infrastructure, including gas-related facilities, may take time to fully recover. That matters most for inflation.

Spot oil prices have fallen, but the earlier shock has not yet fully passed through the data. Higher freight costs, disrupted shipping patterns, lower inventories and prior fuel-price increases are still likely to affect consumer prices with a lag. The impact will vary by country, but oil-importing EM regions in Asia and parts of Europe remain particularly exposed. Food, transport, electricity and administered prices often adjust gradually, and governments may also need to recalibrate subsidies or regulated prices after the fact.

As a result, we do not think we are yet at a clean disinflation inflection point. Our base case is that inflation data in several EM regions may continue to move higher over the next three to six months before stabilizing. More favorable base effects should eventually help the disinflation process, but that is more likely to become visible next year than immediately.

Rates markets are already reflecting this tension. US Treasury yields remain elevated despite stronger risk sentiment, partly because markets are still focused on fiscal concerns, supply and sticky inflation. Across various EM regions, local rates have repriced higher as central banks account for higher expected inflation and, in some cases, the need to defend currencies. Several EM central banks have adopted a more hawkish tone, and some have already tightened policy to preserve credibility.

For hard-currency EM debt, valuations are no longer as compelling as they were earlier in the shock. Spreads have tightened, frontier market bonds have performed well and the market overall has already priced a meaningful improvement in the geopolitical backdrop. The EM asset class still offers attractive carry, but future returns are likely to depend more on security selection and country fundamentals than broad beta.

Exhibit 1: EM Inflation—Headline and Core Consumer Prices

Source: National statistical agencies, J.P. Morgan. As of June 26, 2026. Shaded area is J.P. Morgan forecast.

Local markets may offer a more balanced opportunity set. We expect EM currencies to remain broadly range-bound versus the US dollar rather than enter a sustained appreciation trend. The dollar has not broken decisively lower, and US rates remain a constraint. However, many EM regions still offer attractive nominal and real yields. If volatility continues to decline and geopolitical risk recedes, carry trades should return to the forefront.

Overall, our view is that the backdrop for EM is constructive, but not without risk. The sector has strong technical support from limited issuance and continued inflows, while lower oil prices reduce an important macro headwind. But the market may be moving faster than the real economy. Until inflation data confirms a turn and trade flows normalize more fully, we would favor carry, selectivity and countries with credible policy frameworks over simply chasing the relief rally.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. This material may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Any research and analysis contained in this material has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton ("FT") has not independently verified, validated or audited such data.  Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. The mention of any individual securities should neither constitute nor be construed as a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell any securities, and the information provided regarding such individual securities (if any) is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Franklin Templeton has environmental, social and governance (ESG) capabilities; however, not all strategies or products for a strategy consider “ESG” as part of their investment process.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Templeton, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com. Investments are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed.

You need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print PDF documents. Download a free version from Adobe's website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.